Earlier today InfoTel News reported on the ongoing non-confidence vote in senior administrators at TRU. In the article Tom Friedman is quoted as saying,
“They (faculty) are not satisfied with leadership shown by senior administrators. (…) Our members say to us our views are not being taken into consideration.”
Diana Skoglund, a spokesperson for the university admitted that the vote did not surprise administrators.
Kamloops and District Labour Council (KDLC) Report from TRUFA Delegates February 2018 The Kamloops and District Labour Council (KDLC)...
Arkademic allows for free and open communication between faculty members in a more streamlined, easily managed and efficient platform. As...
I really tried to shrug this off, but alas I’m unable to. I do feel some need to shred...
Tom Friedman rebuts Jim Harrison’s April 13 editorial in today’s Radio NL programming. Click play to listen. You can...
The TRUFA Equity Committee is supporting a local fundraising event hosted by the Kamloops Islamic Association who has sponsored...
The TRUFA Monthly Newsletter is published online every month September to May and occasionally during the summer months. We...
Earlier this morning Shelley Joyce of Daybreak Kamloops hosted TRUFA President, Tom Friedman in the studio. The main topic...
Sponsored by the TRUFA Executive, TRUFA Status of Women Committee and TRUFA Equity Committee, the Body Eclectic Colloquium focuses...
Ask TRUFA: Accessing members-only area of TRUFA website? October 13, 2018
New Faculty Social: October 17th October 13, 2018
Fair Employment Week October 13, 2018
Bargaining 2019: Report from the Bargaining Coordination Committee October 13, 2018
TRUFA Stewards Committee – Who We Are and What We Do October 13, 2018
“Non-Confidence Vote Not a Surprise to TRU University Administrators”.
What, they realized how poorly they have been managing, and were expecting the call for a vote long ago? Sounds like they took a non-confidence vote in themselves!
And if they knew about the faculty unhappiness, why did Senior Admin do NOTHING to try to resolve issues in the meanwhile?
And why was the original spokesperson, who has since seemingly been replaced, expressing shock and surprise?
And why WAS the original spokesperson been replaced?
Non-confidence means no confidence in the administrative abilities of the senior administration. I think such poor administration has been demonstrated in this one article alone.