Earlier today InfoTel News reported on the ongoing non-confidence vote in senior administrators at TRU. In the article Tom Friedman is quoted as saying,
“They (faculty) are not satisfied with leadership shown by senior administrators. (…) Our members say to us our views are not being taken into consideration.”
Diana Skoglund, a spokesperson for the university admitted that the vote did not surprise administrators.
The TRUFA Equity Committee has been working hard with other TRU Community representatives in the TRU-wide Employment Equity and...
Together, we can make college and university more accessible. When: Every Thursday from September 29-October 13 Time: 11am-1pm Where:...
TRU administration continues to brush aside the problem of collegial governance. In spite of the fact that during the...
“TRU administration’s focus on playing the numbers game is yet one more example of avoiding the problem instead of...
The new TRU Game of Life launched in mid-October as part of the TRU Faculty Association’s Campaign to raise...
Recently, Paul Simpson and colleagues hosted the first meeting of Faculty Council (FC) Chairs with the intent of creating...
Thank you for participating in our TRU Governance Quiz! This video details the correct answers to all five questions....
The TRU senior administrative track record since February 15th is proof of the Senior TRU Administration’s failure to adhere...
TRUFA 2017 Annual General Meeting April 17, 2017
2017 President’s Report to TRUFA Annual General Meeting April 17, 2017
2017 Performance Review Committee AGM Report April 17, 2017
2017 Salary & Working Conditions Committee Annual AGM April 17, 2017
2017 FPSE Non-Regular Faculty Committee AGM Report April 17, 2017
“Non-Confidence Vote Not a Surprise to TRU University Administrators”.
What, they realized how poorly they have been managing, and were expecting the call for a vote long ago? Sounds like they took a non-confidence vote in themselves!
And if they knew about the faculty unhappiness, why did Senior Admin do NOTHING to try to resolve issues in the meanwhile?
And why was the original spokesperson, who has since seemingly been replaced, expressing shock and surprise?
And why WAS the original spokesperson been replaced?
Non-confidence means no confidence in the administrative abilities of the senior administration. I think such poor administration has been demonstrated in this one article alone.